Hercules: good legs, lousy movie.
Fierce, productive leg training is the true domain of the
serious lifter. Gyms from here to anywhere are littered with young
and inexperienced weight trainers who gladly ground and pound their
upper bodies into dust, yet expend minimal effort, and perform
classic lower-body exercises dismally. That is, if they
train legs at all.
Seriously, what could be worse?
Fact is, if you want a balanced physique, both in aesthetic
appeal and athletic performance, you have to devote regular workout
sessions to your "wheels" and strive to become a master. All the
greatest bodybuilders (not necessarily the most winning),
powerlifters, and strength athletes became great because they
developed an intimate and painful relationship with lower-body
training. There simply is no other way.
In case somebody didn't catch the reference. Yes, I'm a
metalhead.
Before we proceed, let's discuss this whole "master" concept.
Being a master of legs training has nothing to do with the ability
to load a leg press with 30 frickin' plates and bang out "big reps"
that see the knee joints barely articulating. And it isn't
masterful to have the courage and stamina to lift until you puke,
either. Two admirable qualities, to be sure, but not necessarily
masterful.
No, being a gym master is all about knowing the finer nuances of
proper exercise form and being able to exploit these to your
benefit. Think Tom Platz. Think Ed Coan. Most likely, don't think
of yourself. Yet.
This could be you. But not for a while.
Now I'd like to take a few minutes and rip on a common piece of
leg-training apparatus, the standard leg extension machine. What a
hunk of crap, huh? Unless you're recovering from a verylong
period of bed rest, jettison the leg extension from your routine. I
guess it's also OK to use it to warm up the knees and muscles. But
the truth is, not much muscle has ever been built – nor
strength developed – from performing the movement.
This douche looks too damn happy for this to be a good
exercise.
In fact, I'd suggest quite confidently that more knees have been
wrecked or aggravated by its use and misuse than any other
lower-body exercise. So to all those who claim squats hurt their
knees: It's most likely those full-stack knee extensions you yank
up, Chuck. Not your quarter-depth 185-pound squats, you
wuss.
Gradual use of heavier and heavier resistance over several sets
of an exercise is a good idea for most trainers. Doing such a thing
warms the muscles and connective tissue and, in general, prepares
the mind and body for the most challenging reps to come. Somewhere,
however, the concept behind pyramid-training has largely been
lost.
The idea is to increase poundage as repetitions decrease.
So why is it I see a majority of folks hitting reps to failure on
all the damn sets? Has it ever occurred to these folks that doing
such a thing only pre-fatigues their muscles for the sets with the
most resistance? You know, the growth sets?
Bench pressing 225 to failure, or worse, to negative failure (forced reps), is gonna kill what you could ultimately
perform with a top weight of, say, 275 pounds. I'm talking about
the difference between getting three reps and getting six to eight
reps! There's no law against performing as few as three reps on
your last "warmup" sets, even if you aim to jam out medium-to-high
reps on the top sets.
Achieving training volume the way I described above, by
performing as many reps as possible, including the warm-up sets, is
a stupid way to go about it.
Dramatic muscle gains can come from doing a ton of work in a
relatively short period of time, however. Determining a poundage to
use as a "work" weight and then performing several straight sets
with minimal rest in between can go a long way towards huge total
volume.
Or, if you prefer, once you arrive at your top training
resistance on a movement (the right way), go to failure on each
successive set going down the other side of the pyramid (as
long as you don't mind struggling at the end with what is normally
for you a light weight). The idea, regardless, is to cram as many
reps and sets into an hour (or a bit more) as humanly possible.
This laziness has gotta stop, people. It's gotten so bad that
quarter-inch depth on leg presses and squats are the new craze with
the kids; little shits who have grown up cutting corners on hard
work. I guess doing half-rep bench presses wasn't lazy
enough.
Are you man enough to squat like this
girl?
Look, take your squats down below parallel (keep going, tough
guy, you're not there yet) and bring your knees to at least your
chest when you leg press. You can go even lower with your toes
slightly flared so your knees will come out to the
sides.
The half-rep phenomenon usually has something to do with ego.
That is, the trainee is afraid his fragile little self-image will
be bruised if people see him using the kind of weight he'd have to
use if he actually performed full repetitions. It's a vicious
circle of stupidity and weakness, however, because without full
repetitions the lifter won't ever develop impressive strength.
This is why Homer will never develop impressive
strength.
Deep reps considerably lessen the resistance you can use but
produce 20 times the pump and go a long way in helping to actually
build some muscle. What's that you say? You say your joints can't
take it? Oh, jeez. If that were true, you'd be hesitant to unlock
your knees with the 15 plates per side you use every week on the
leg press.
Do some of you hear the excuses coming out of your mouth? They
might as well be coming out of somewhere else.
Many still like to champion the need for weight trainers to do
lots and lots of variations of exercises in each workout to
"stimulate the muscles from all angles." Rubbish. How many
different ways can the legs move? Speaking about quads and hams,
they articulate the lower legs in line with the upper thighs, and
articulate the lower legs back and behind the upper legs.
The best way to overload the muscles of the quads and hams is to
push at something with your feet. So, sure, mix stuff up from workout to workout (leg press this time; squat next time),
but don't fall into the trap of believing you must sit and press a
weight, stand and press a weight, lean back against a sled and
press a weight, all in the same workout!
If you're maximally taxing a muscle or muscles, why must you do
it from six different angles and on different machines?
Silly.
This seems like the time to bring up just how valuable the squat
exercise is to leg development and overall bodybuilding. The Smith
machine and hack versions are OK, but pale horribly when butted up
against the ultimate-hardcore, free-bar kind. Don't even try to
argue against this. It's fact.
There are physique athletes who claim standard leg presses are
better for developing the specific muscles on the fronts of the
thighs and this might be the case. However, nothing packs more
overall meat onto the entirety of the lower body and helps add
muscular bodyweight than the squat. You want to be 200-plus pounds
of reasonably-hard sinew? Squat. You wanna be a super athlete?
Squat. You want to be one badass shit kicker, period? Squat.
Did I mention you should squat?
News flash: you should squat.
Lifters have argued for decades what the best rep ranges to use
are and what style is best. Generally, bodybuilders have favored
medium to high (6-20) repetitions with an "Olympic" (close-stance /
high bar) technique, and powerlifters low to medium reps with a
"power" (wide-stance / low bar) style.
Narrow stance, high bar
Wide stance, low bar.
The former tends to throw a majority of the stress on the
quadriceps and the latter onto the hips, butt and low back.
However, if your body type isn't well suited to Olympic
squatting and consequently you can't maintain an upright
torso position and flat back, the opposite can happen. Most of the
stress will fall onto your low back in a very bad way and injury
can occur. Sometimes a hybrid between the two styles works best.
Experiment.
A variety of repetitions should be employed, regardless of
whether you're a physique builder or pure strength athlete. Very
low reps will help a bodybuilder build thickness, density, and
strength, while its useful to utilize greater poundages for medium
to high repetition sets for the development of muscle
"volume."
Powerlifters, contrary to what many stagnant-thinkers believe,
can certainly benefit from high-repetition sets. Doing so builds
muscular bulk, encourages physical "robustness," trains mental
toughness, develops knee and structural "integrity," and can help
build limit strength.
The backs of the upper legs, the hamstrings, are often neglected
to the point of madness. True, no matter how hard one trains them,
they'll always stay a few steps behind the strength of the
thighs. But thick and powerful hams lend the legs a balanced and
functional look, as well as magnify the poundages that one's able
to hoist, along with preventing knee injury.
The regular hamstring curl (lying or standing) is a great
exercise, and so too is the stiff-legged deadlift. Perform the curl
with absolute control, medium repetitions, and a tight and stalled
rep at the top (right at your butt, bud); and the "deads" with
slightly bent knees and an exaggerated back arch and stretch.
Again, maintain complete control, and attempt to squeeze your
butt cheeks all the way through your reps. Straight sets (same
resistance and reps for multiple sets) seem to work great when
blasting the hamstrings.
Nice hams.
For a change of pace, and to ensure they get adequately torched,
train your hams first in a workout every few leg sessions. And
there's no need to separate your quad and hamstring workouts
unless you want to add another session for one or the other for
specific purposes.
Powerlifters are renowned for sometimes spending hours in
the gym for a single session. Three-hour squat sessions are not
uncommon. And, being a powerlifter, I can tell you why. It's not
the amount of sets, necessarily. The lengthened workouts are
usually a result of extensive stretching (by way of warm-up sets)
and rest between sets.
Bodybuilders, on the other hand, are usually known for their
frisky, brisk workouts. I believe this type of training is called
"quality" training (real clever). Moving fast between sets and
exercises can produce a killer pump, no question. So what isthe best way?
There really isn't a hard and fast rule when it comes to how
long one should spend in the gym for an average workout. But there
does seem to be truth to the belief that, to build maximal muscle,
total volume of work performed is crucial. And studies do show that
a lifter's best anabolic hormone response is within the first hour
to hour-and-a-half, give or take. With these two things in mind,
one can see why, for best muscle gain, lots of work (sets and reps)
should be performed in as little time as possible.
Numbers of sets to perform depends on what your ultimate goal
is. If you desire a heaping volume of muscle, many sets crammed
into, again, as little time as possible, with semi-regular two or
three-week periods of heavier and slower sets for added strength,
thickness and density, is what you need.
If you crave absolute and freakish strength, perform a limited
number of medium to heavy sets with maximal time between each to
promote peak performance. These recent years have shone light on
the need to perform very light sets for very low reps (2-3) with
extremely short rest periods (say, 30-45 seconds), and using
explosive contractions to develop speed and acceleration (power).
Don't make the mistake many trainees do, by becoming a champion
of redundancy. Instead of performing squats, leg presses, hack
squats, etc. all in the same workout, choose one (or two, max) as
your prime movement in each session. Beat the crap out of it. And
with all the time you'll be saving not doing shit leg extensions,
you should have lots of time.
One has to be weary of overtraining. Always. Nothing will derail
progress in the gym (and, consequently, in the reflection in the
mirror) like pushing your recovery system too far. We all have
finite ability to recuperate in reasonable time from such severe
activity as intensive bodybuilding. Weight training is one of the
greatest physical stresses to which the body can be
subjected.
But keeping the dreaded overtraining demon in mind, nothing says
"growth spurt" like the semi-occasional session of berserk
brutality. And a fantastic way to force some sort of adaptive
response from your body is beating the crap out of a single
exercise.
First, choose a movement worthy of your blood, sweat, and tears.
For legs, something like the leg press, squat, or hack squat. A
multi-joint exercise, that is. Forget "fluff" exercises.
On a day of "beating the crap out if it," you can choose one or
two extra movements to compliment the main exercise, or just not do
anything else, period. Certainly your lower body won't be lacking
any growth stimulus after you're done the one
exercise.
Example 1:
As described earlier, use straight sets. Once you've arrived at
your chosen work weight, perform multiple sets using the same
repetitions. The trick here is to find what this poundage is. Many trainers overestimate what they will be able to
use. It's one thing to perform one or two HARD sets with a certain
weight, and quite another to maintain the same reps over several
sets. Here are some ideas for this Beating The Crap Out Of It
technique:
4x4
5x5
6x6
7x7
8x8
...you get the idea.
Example 2:
For this second way to "beat the crap out of it," choose a
weight as your top-poundage set, perform as many reps as possible,
wait a good four or five minutes, perform another set for as many
reps as possible, and then start dropping the weight, always
attempting as many repetitions per set as you can. When you can no
longer walk properly, you're done. Hobble over to the local burger
shack and get blitzed on beef.
Cut the cheese out and this wouldn't be too bad a
post-"beating the crap out of it" workout meal.
Mr. Olympia legend Lee Haney once said "stimulate, don't
annihilate." Good advice. What this means to us mere mortals
is, train to force an adaptive response, but not to the point where
you drive your body into a severe state of catabolism. You know,
where it's barely able to maintain life.
Lee Haney
It would be hypocritical of me to suggest, however, that you
should never push the envelope from time to time. This is why I
described a couple great ways to occasionally "beat the crap out of
yourself" in the last segment. Every successful weight trainer does
it with varying frequency. Just don't make it a habit. Generally,
you should leave the gym tired but invigorated, not slumped over
hoping for death.
Get serious about your lower-body training and turn your
workouts into events. Be in possession of a balanced
physique, one that boasts a strong, athletic and well-developed
pair of legs. Have a build for which you can be proud. One that
silently screams "I walk the walk."
Don't over-think the effort and frequent pain that this will
require. These don't matter to someone with the warrior spirit. Dig
deep, train hard, and attain satisfaction and triumph the likes of
which few will experience in their lifetime.
The question is, do you have the guts?
Ask Me Anything I receive great questions in my T Nation Community Coaching Lab. If…
Ask Me Anything I get a lot of great questions in my T Nation Community…
An Exaggerated Warm-Up Isn't Helpful I don't know when the lengthy warm-up became a thing,…
Training and Your Metabolic State When I think "workout," I think of speeds. Your metabolic…